Meeting Accessibility Standards (WCAG) in Public Systems: How Do You Design a System That Withstands Public Scrutiny?
Engineering leaders working on public systems know that meeting accessibility standards isn't a "Nice to Have" - it's a legal requirement. Any system intended for the general public must meet WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) standards at level AA at minimum, and failing to do so can lead to lawsuits, demands for expensive remediation, and damage to the organization's public reputation.
On the government project, accessibility was a first-order requirement, not a late one. We designed every UI component to meet accessibility requirements from day one: sufficient color contrast, keyboard-only navigation, alt-text descriptions for every visual element, and support for screen readers. This wasn't done in a "final stage" - it was built into the skeleton of the Design System.
In addition, development received a handoff package that included not only the visual design, but also explicit guidelines for the behavior of every component - ARIA Labels, Tab order, and response to keyboard states. The development team didn't have to "invent" how to make things accessible - everything was defined in advance.
For CTOs working on public systems, or on systems that require compliance with accessibility standards, the insight is this: require your product designer to understand accessibility in depth, and to deliver a handoff package that includes explicit guidelines for every component. Accessibility added at the end of a project costs 10x more than accessibility built in from the start.
Related articles

About
Making complicated into easy for users.
Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.