Documentation That Outlives the Project
The risk a PMO should worry about most is the one that arrives after the team disperses: the design rationale that lived only in someone's head and left with them. In research and scientific software this is acute, because so many decisions encode domain logic, why this filter defaults this way, why this workflow matches how a particular discipline actually reasons. If that context is not written down, the next team relearns it the hard way or, worse, reverses a deliberate decision and reintroduces a solved problem. So I treat documentation as a deliverable with the same weight as the screens. I document the Design System components and their intended use, the patterns for data-heavy interactions like virtualized tables and complex filters, and critically the why behind the non-obvious choices. I keep it close to where people work rather than buried in a forgotten drive. For organizational handoff, my aim is continuity: a new designer, developer, or PM can pick up the system and understand not just what it does but the reasoning it rests on. That is what turns a one-time project into a durable, maintainable product.
Related articles

About
Making complicated into easy for users.
Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.