Skip to main content
Meytal Dahan
Back to insights

Documentation That Outlives the Project

The risk a PMO should worry about most is the one that arrives after the team disperses: the design rationale that lived only in someone's head and left with them. In research and scientific software this is acute, because so many decisions encode domain logic, why this filter defaults this way, why this workflow matches how a particular discipline actually reasons. If that context is not written down, the next team relearns it the hard way or, worse, reverses a deliberate decision and reintroduces a solved problem. So I treat documentation as a deliverable with the same weight as the screens. I document the Design System components and their intended use, the patterns for data-heavy interactions like virtualized tables and complex filters, and critically the why behind the non-obvious choices. I keep it close to where people work rather than buried in a forgotten drive. For organizational handoff, my aim is continuity: a new designer, developer, or PM can pick up the system and understand not just what it does but the reasoning it rests on. That is what turns a one-time project into a durable, maintainable product.

Get in touch

Have a project in mind?

Drop a line. Meytalyav@gmail.com

Related articles

Academic & Research Systems
Engineering LeadersR&D Collaboration

Designing Data-Heavy Tools Alongside R&D

In data-heavy research tools, the design IS the architecture. A filter that's trivial in Figma can be a query that melts your backend. I bring engineering in before I sketch: what's cheap to query, what's expensive, where we virtualize. For expert users on huge datasets, speed isn't polish. It's the feature.

Read
Academic & Research Systems
Project ManagersUsability Testing

Usability Testing With Busy Researchers: Protecting the Schedule

Usability testing with senior researchers is a scheduling risk as much as a design one. They're scarce and hard to re-book. So: test early on prototypes, go async where you can, and tie each round to a milestone decision. The worst usability finding is the one that arrives after development already committed.

Read
Academic & Research Systems
Engineering LeadersProject-Specific Data Visualization

Visualization That Survives Real Scientific Data

Charting libraries assume tidy, modest datasets. Scientific data breaks that assumption hard — millions of points, irregular distributions, nulls that actually mean something. Generic visualization stacks either choke or quietly mislead. In research tooling I treat data viz as a joint design-and-engineering problem: virtualized or WebGL rendering for huge series, downsampling that preserves outliers instead of smoothing them away, progressive loading so structure appears first. And on integrity — honest axes, visible uncertainty, no hiding the points that don't fit. Expert users spot a misleading chart instantly, and then they stop trusting the whole product. Visualization here is bespoke by necessity.

Read
Meytal Dahan

About

Making complicated into easy for users.

Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.