Skip to main content
Meytal Dahan
Back to insights

Data Viz That Holds Up When the Public Is Reading the Numbers

When a public-sector dashboard renders a chart, it carries more weight than a SaaS analytics view — citizens, journalists, and oversight bodies may all read the same numbers, and a misleading axis becomes a credibility problem, not a styling nitpick. For an engineering leader, that raises the bar on how visualization is built, not just how it looks. I treat charts as a component-layer concern: accessible by construction, with truthful axes, honest baselines, and a tabular equivalent of the same data so the information survives a screen reader and satisfies WCAG. A chart that only exists as pixels is a chart that excludes people and fails an audit. I also design for Layered Complexity — a clear headline figure anyone can grasp, with drill-down detail available for the analysts who need it, rather than dumping every dimension at once. On the R&D side, the engineering wins are real: standardized, tokenized chart primitives mean teams aren't each hand-rolling D3 with different accessibility gaps and different definitions of the same metric. Performance matters too — these views render on old hardware and slow connections, so I favor lean, server-friendly rendering over heavy client libraries that punish the citizens least able to wait.

Get in touch

Have a project in mind?

Drop a line. Meytalyav@gmail.com

Related articles

Government & Public Sector
FoundersFrom MVP to Full Version

Why GovTech MVPs Don't Look Like Startup MVPs

Founders are taught to ship the scrappiest MVP and iterate in public. In govtech, that instinct can sink you. A citizen service that looks like a beta — or breaks for a screen reader user — loses trust you may never win back. So I redefine 'minimum': not a thin slice of everything, but one complete, accessible, end-to-end path a real person can finish with dignity. Narrow the use cases brutally. Never narrow the quality. Then grow in concentric circles — keep the simple core intact, layer depth around it. Your launch version should be something you'd defend in a public hearing. That's the bar.

Read
Government & Public Sector
CEOsPersonalization & Tailored Models

Personalization That Survives Public Scrutiny

When CEOs hear 'personalization' they picture a consumer feed that learns you. In a public service, that's a liability — citizens didn't opt into being profiled, and any hint of differential treatment invites fairness questions you don't want to answer in public. So I reframe it as relevance, not prediction. Not a model guessing what you want — a service showing each person only what actually applies to them, driven by their situation, not surveillance. A parent sees the parent path. Someone who already applied sees status, not a fresh form. That cuts confusion and call volume, and every tailoring decision stays explainable. The efficiency of personalization, without the consumer-playbook downside.

Read
Government & Public Sector
Project ManagersUsability Testing

Usability Testing as Schedule Insurance for Public Services

Usability testing isn't a threat to your timeline — it's insurance on it. The costly defects aren't the ones found in a session; they're the ones found after launch when the fix means re-planning everyone's quarter. Test early, test on the worst device, and label every finding by whether it blocks the core task. A PMO can schedule around that. It can't schedule around surprises.

Read
Meytal Dahan

About

Making complicated into easy for users.

Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.