Skip to main content
Meytal Dahan
Back to insights

Documenting So the System Outlives the Solo Designer

Zammit — Designed the Retail Shelving Planning System - the platform's most demanding configurator, where every dimension, shelf, edge profile, and placement rule is defined - into a spatial design tool retail professionals could use without CAD knowledge.
As the only product designer on Zammit for about two years, I was a single point of failure — and good documentation was how I refused to stay one. When one person holds the logic for 40 configurators, 25 e-commerce flows, and 6 segment onepagers in their head, the organization is exposed the day that person is unavailable. From a PMO perspective, that is operational risk, and it is solvable with discipline. So I documented the things that are easy to lose: why a configurator option exists, how it maps to a real fabrication choice I learned on the factory floor, and where the DriveWorks engine's constraints shaped a decision. The intent behind a flow is far more fragile than the flow itself; a screenshot survives, but the reasoning evaporates. I also kept the e-commerce patterns documented as shared conventions so a new contributor could extend account, OTP, or checkout without reinventing them. For a project manager, this is what makes a handoff to the wider organization actually land — knowledge transfer, not just file transfer. The product I cared most about leaving behind was not the 40 configurators. It was the ability for someone else to confidently maintain and grow them.

Get in touch

Have a project in mind?

Drop a line. Meytalyav@gmail.com

Related articles

Zammit
Project ManagersUsability Testing

Testing a Spatial Configurator Without CAD

On Zammit's shelving configurator, we asked people to lay out custom shelving — dimensions, shelf count, depth, placement — with zero CAD knowledge. That is a usability risk you cannot hand-wave. So I ran testing as a recurring checkpoint tied to delivery milestones, not a one-off before launch. The payoff is for project managers as much as designers: testing turns a scary, vague risk ('can buyers do this without a salesperson?') into specific, scheduled, fixable issues. And inside an engine with real constraints, testing early tells you which problems are worth engineering time and which a better sequence solves for free. Predictability beats surprises.

Read
Zammit
Product ManagersMicro-interactions & Animation

Micro-interactions That Made an Engine's Rules Feel Like Feedback

Rule-heavy configurators feel like the system is fighting you — unless feedback shows why. On Zammit, micro-interactions turned the engine's logic into a conversation: a value recalculating, the summary shifting, an invalid option visibly settling out of reach instead of vanishing. PMs, the test for every animation: does it explain the system's behavior, or just decorate it? Only the former protects flow completion.

Read
Zammit
Project ManagersDelivery & Handoff to Development

Handing Off 40 Configurators Without Losing the Thread

Handing off ~40 configurators, 25 e-commerce flows, and 6 onepagers — solo, over ~2 years — taught me that handoff isn't an event, it's a rhythm. At that volume the real risk a project manager loses sleep over is drift: checkout behaving one way here, another way there. My defense was deliberate pattern reuse and handing off the decision logic, not just visuals — especially for configurators bound to the DriveWorks engine's rules. Shared patterns are schedule insurance: estimates hold, review cycles shrink, and developers implement without guessing. Clear intent plus clear constraints beats a backlog of clarifying questions every time.

Read
Meytal Dahan

About

Making complicated into easy for users.

Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.