Skip to main content
Meytal Dahan
Back to insights

Researching Buyers Who Used to Just Call Sales

ZammitProduct ManagersUser ResearchManufacturing / B2B Procurement
Zammit — Designed the Retail Shelving Planning System - the platform's most demanding configurator, where every dimension, shelf, edge profile, and placement rule is defined - into a spatial design tool retail professionals could use without CAD knowledge.
The hardest part of Zammit was not the configurator — it was understanding people who had never bought this way. For years, an engineer, architect, or contractor who needed custom laser-cut parts picked up the phone and let a salesperson translate intent into a spec. We were removing that human, so my research had to surface everything that intermediary silently did. I interviewed across all four segments — engineers, architects, contractors, retail professionals — because their mental models diverged sharply. Engineers thought in tolerances; retail professionals thought in finished shelving and showroom outcomes. A configurator that assumed CAD fluency would have lost half of them. I also visited the factory, which reframed the whole effort: research is not only about users, it is about the constraints they are configuring against. For a PM, the takeaway is that scope follows research, not the reverse. The 40 configurators and 10 categories we eventually shipped were prioritized because research told us which decisions buyers could make alone and which ones genuinely required guidance. Without that, we would have built a faithful digital copy of a sales call nobody wanted to repeat.

Get in touch

Have a project in mind?

Drop a line. Meytalyav@gmail.com

Related articles

Zammit
Project ManagersUsability Testing

Testing a Spatial Configurator Without CAD

On Zammit's shelving configurator, we asked people to lay out custom shelving — dimensions, shelf count, depth, placement — with zero CAD knowledge. That is a usability risk you cannot hand-wave. So I ran testing as a recurring checkpoint tied to delivery milestones, not a one-off before launch. The payoff is for project managers as much as designers: testing turns a scary, vague risk ('can buyers do this without a salesperson?') into specific, scheduled, fixable issues. And inside an engine with real constraints, testing early tells you which problems are worth engineering time and which a better sequence solves for free. Predictability beats surprises.

Read
Zammit
Product ManagersMicro-interactions & Animation

Micro-interactions That Made an Engine's Rules Feel Like Feedback

Rule-heavy configurators feel like the system is fighting you — unless feedback shows why. On Zammit, micro-interactions turned the engine's logic into a conversation: a value recalculating, the summary shifting, an invalid option visibly settling out of reach instead of vanishing. PMs, the test for every animation: does it explain the system's behavior, or just decorate it? Only the former protects flow completion.

Read
Zammit
Project ManagersDelivery & Handoff to Development

Handing Off 40 Configurators Without Losing the Thread

Handing off ~40 configurators, 25 e-commerce flows, and 6 onepagers — solo, over ~2 years — taught me that handoff isn't an event, it's a rhythm. At that volume the real risk a project manager loses sleep over is drift: checkout behaving one way here, another way there. My defense was deliberate pattern reuse and handing off the decision logic, not just visuals — especially for configurators bound to the DriveWorks engine's rules. Shared patterns are schedule insurance: estimates hold, review cycles shrink, and developers implement without guessing. Clear intent plus clear constraints beats a backlog of clarifying questions every time.

Read
Meytal Dahan

About

Making complicated into easy for users.

Senior product designer with a decade of work across complex systems - financial risk platforms, legal operations, healthcare apps, manufacturing tooling and insurance portals. The common thread is depth: products where the data is rich, the users are expert, and the interface has to disappear into the work.